Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Metric Hub

Precision + General Metric Papers

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). 15 papers are grouped in this metric page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env. Most common rater population: Domain Experts. Frequent quality control: Calibration. Common metric signal: precision. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Feb 26, 2026.

Papers: 15 Last published: Feb 26, 2026 Global RSS

Research Narrative

Grounded narrative Model: deterministic-grounded Source: persisted

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). This page tracks 15 papers for Precision + General Metric Papers. Dominant protocol signals include automatic metrics, simulation environments, with frequent benchmark focus on multiple benchmark families and metric focus on precision, accuracy. Use the grounded sections below to prioritize reproducible protocol choices, benchmark-matched comparisons, and judge-vs-human evaluation checks.

Why This Matters For Eval Research

Protocol Takeaways

Metric Interpretation

  • precision is reported in 100% of hub papers (15/15); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
  • accuracy is reported in 40% of hub papers (6/15); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.

Abstract Evidence Highlights

Direct snippets from paper abstracts to ground protocol and benchmark interpretation.

Human-eval abstract signal: Quantization-Aware Training from scratch has emerged as a promising approach for building efficient large language models (LLMs) with extremely low-bit weights (sub 2-bit), which can offer substantial advantages for edge deployment.

Human-eval abstract signal: Cyberbullying has become a serious and growing concern in todays virtual world.

precision metric signal: However, existing methods still fail to achieve satisfactory accuracy and scalability.

precision metric signal: Developing a generalized model with moderate accuracy remains challenging.

rater calibration quality-control signal: However, it has been observed that the calibration parameters for quantization are typically linked to specific precisions, which presents challenges during elastic-precision calibration and precision switching at runtime.

rater calibration quality-control signal: Using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluate models across comprehensive metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, MCC, Brier score, and Expected Calibration Error.

Protocol abstract signal: Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming scholarly tasks like search and summarization, but their reliability remains uncertain.

Protocol abstract signal: Maqam, a singing type, is a significant component of Kurdish music.

Researcher Checklist

  • Close gap on Papers with explicit human feedback. Coverage is a replication risk (6.7% vs 45% target).
  • Tighten coverage on Papers reporting quality controls. Coverage is usable but incomplete (20% vs 30% target).
  • Close gap on Papers naming benchmarks/datasets. Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).
  • Maintain strength on Papers naming evaluation metrics. Coverage is strong (100% vs 35% target).
  • Close gap on Papers with known rater population. Coverage is a replication risk (13.3% vs 35% target).
  • Close gap on Papers with known annotation unit. Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).

Papers with explicit human feedback

Coverage is a replication risk (6.7% vs 45% target).

Papers reporting quality controls

Coverage is usable but incomplete (20% vs 30% target).

Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).

Papers naming evaluation metrics

Coverage is strong (100% vs 35% target).

Papers with known rater population

Coverage is a replication risk (13.3% vs 35% target).

Papers with known annotation unit

Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).

Suggested Reading Order

  1. 1. pQuant: Towards Effective Low-Bit Language Models via Decoupled Linear Quantization-Aware Training

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  2. 2. A Fusion of context-aware based BanglaBERT and Two-Layer Stacked LSTM Framework for Multi-Label Cyberbullying Detection

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  3. 3. An Expert Schema for Evaluating Large Language Model Errors in Scholarly Question-Answering Systems

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  4. 4. Voices of the Mountains: Deep Learning-Based Vocal Error Detection System for Kurdish Maqams

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  5. 5. PerSoMed: A Large-Scale Balanced Dataset for Persian Social Media Text Classification

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  6. 6. TriTopic: Tri-Modal Graph-Based Topic Modeling with Iterative Refinement and Archetypes

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  7. 7. MoBiQuant: Mixture-of-Bits Quantization for Token-Adaptive Elastic LLMs

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  8. 8. AAVGen: Precision Engineering of Adeno-associated Viral Capsids for Renal Selective Targeting

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

Known Limitations

  • Rater population is under-specified (13.3% coverage).
  • Annotation unit is under-specified (0% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.

Research Utility Links

automatic_metrics vs simulation_env

both=1, left_only=14, right_only=0

1 papers use both Automatic Metrics and Simulation Env.

Top Papers Reporting This Metric

Other Metric Hubs