Skip to content
← Back to explorer

HFEPX Hub

General + Web Browsing Papers

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). 13 papers are grouped in this hub page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env. Most common rater population: Domain Experts. Common annotation unit: Trajectory. Frequently cited benchmark: BrowseComp. Common metric signal: accuracy. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Feb 24, 2026.

Papers: 13 Last published: Feb 24, 2026 Global RSS Tag RSS
GeneralWeb Browsing

Research Narrative

Grounded narrative Model: deterministic-grounded Source: persisted

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). This page tracks 13 papers for General + Web Browsing Papers. Dominant protocol signals include automatic metrics, simulation environments, with frequent benchmark focus on BrowseComp, Memoryarena and metric focus on accuracy, cost. Use the grounded sections below to prioritize reproducible protocol choices, benchmark-matched comparisons, and judge-vs-human evaluation checks.

Why This Matters For Eval Research

Protocol Takeaways

Benchmark Interpretation

  • BrowseComp appears in 7.7% of hub papers (1/13); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.
  • Memoryarena appears in 7.7% of hub papers (1/13); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.

Metric Interpretation

  • accuracy is reported in 23.1% of hub papers (3/13); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
  • cost is reported in 7.7% of hub papers (1/13); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.

Researcher Checklist

  • Tighten coverage on Papers with explicit human feedback. Coverage is usable but incomplete (30.8% vs 45% target).
  • Close gap on Papers reporting quality controls. Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).
  • Tighten coverage on Papers naming benchmarks/datasets. Coverage is usable but incomplete (23.1% vs 35% target).
  • Maintain strength on Papers naming evaluation metrics. Coverage is strong (53.8% vs 35% target).
  • Close gap on Papers with known rater population. Coverage is a replication risk (7.7% vs 35% target).
  • Close gap on Papers with known annotation unit. Coverage is a replication risk (15.4% vs 35% target).

Papers with explicit human feedback

Coverage is usable but incomplete (30.8% vs 45% target).

Papers reporting quality controls

Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).

Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

Coverage is usable but incomplete (23.1% vs 35% target).

Papers naming evaluation metrics

Coverage is strong (53.8% vs 35% target).

Papers with known rater population

Coverage is a replication risk (7.7% vs 35% target).

Papers with known annotation unit

Coverage is a replication risk (15.4% vs 35% target).

Suggested Reading Order

  1. 1. Efficient Hierarchical Any-Angle Path Planning on Multi-Resolution 3D Grids

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  2. 2. Onboard-Targeted Segmentation of Straylight in Space Camera Sensors

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  3. 3. Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting, including rater and quality-control evidence.

  4. 4. Mind the Style: Impact of Communication Style on Human-Chatbot Interaction

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  5. 5. Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents

    Adds automatic metrics with pairwise preferences for broader coverage within this hub.

  6. 6. MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks

    Adds simulation environments with pairwise preferences for broader coverage within this hub.

  7. 7. BrowseComp-$V^3$: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

  8. 8. The Automatic Verification of Image-Text Claims (AVerImaTeC) Shared Task

    Adds automatic metrics for broader coverage within this hub.

Known Limitations

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (7.7% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.

Research Utility Links

automatic_metrics vs simulation_env

both=1, left_only=6, right_only=6

1 papers use both Automatic Metrics and Simulation Env.

Benchmark Brief

BrowseComp

Coverage: 1 papers (7.7%)

1 papers (7.7%) mention BrowseComp.

Examples: BrowseComp-$V^3$: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents

Benchmark Brief

Memoryarena

Coverage: 1 papers (7.7%)

1 papers (7.7%) mention Memoryarena.

Examples: MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks

Benchmark Brief

Rtc-Bench

Coverage: 1 papers (7.7%)

1 papers (7.7%) mention Rtc-Bench.

Examples: RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS Environments

Metric Brief

accuracy

Coverage: 3 papers (23.1%)

3 papers (23.1%) mention accuracy.

Examples: Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents , BrowseComp-$V^3$: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents , The Automatic Verification of Image-Text Claims (AVerImaTeC) Shared Task

Metric Brief

cost

Coverage: 1 papers (7.7%)

1 papers (7.7%) mention cost.

Examples: Aerial Vision-Language Navigation with a Unified Framework for Spatial, Temporal and Embodied Reasoning

Metric Brief

jailbreak success rate

Coverage: 1 papers (7.7%)

1 papers (7.7%) mention jailbreak success rate.

Examples: RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS Environments

Most Cited In This Hub

Fast path to methods with the strongest citation traction in this scope.

Papers: Efficient Hierarchical Any-Angle Path Planning on Multi-Resolution 3D Grids , Onboard-Targeted Segmentation of Straylight in Space Camera Sensors , Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots

Most Recent

Fast path to latest protocol changes and newly published evaluation setups.

Papers: Efficient Hierarchical Any-Angle Path Planning on Multi-Resolution 3D Grids , Onboard-Targeted Segmentation of Straylight in Space Camera Sensors , Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots

Best Protocol Detail

Papers with explicit rater/unit metadata and quality-control signals for reproducibility.

Papers: Efficient Hierarchical Any-Angle Path Planning on Multi-Resolution 3D Grids , Onboard-Targeted Segmentation of Straylight in Space Camera Sensors , Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots

Top Papers

Related Hubs