Skip to content
← Back to explorer

HFEPX Hub

Simulation Env + General (Last 30 Days)

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Mar 1, 2026). 11 papers are grouped in this hub page.

Read Full Context

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Mar 1, 2026). 11 papers are grouped in this hub page. Common evaluation modes: Simulation Env, Automatic Metrics. Most common rater population: Domain Experts. Common annotation unit: Trajectory. Frequently cited benchmark: ALFWorld. Common metric signal: accuracy. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Feb 13, 2026.

Papers: 11 Last published: Feb 13, 2026 Global RSS Tag RSS
Simulation EnvGeneralLast 30d

Researcher Quick Triage

This hub is best used for protocol triage and replication planning from abstract-level evidence. Quality band: Developing .

High-Signal Coverage

100.0%

11 / 11 sampled papers are not low-signal flagged.

Replication-Ready Set

0

Benchmark + metric + eval mode explicitly present.

Judge/Human Comparability

0

Papers containing both `human_eval` and `llm_as_judge`.

  • 0 papers are replication-ready (benchmark + metric + explicit evaluation mode).
  • 0 papers support judge-vs-human agreement analysis.
  • 0 papers report explicit quality controls (calibration/adjudication/IAA).

Primary action: Use this page for scouting only; collect additional papers before attempting replication-critical comparisons.

Why This Matters (Expanded)

Why This Matters For Eval Research

  • simulation environments appears in 100% of papers in this hub.
  • ALFWorld is a recurring benchmark anchor for cross-paper comparisons in this page.
  • long-horizon tasks appears in 45.5% of papers, indicating agentic evaluation demand.
Protocol Notes (Expanded)

Protocol Takeaways

  • Quality-control reporting is sparse in this slice; prioritize papers with explicit calibration or adjudication steps.
  • Rater context is mostly domain experts, and annotation is commonly trajectory-level annotation; use this to scope replication staffing.
  • Pair this hub with a human_eval-heavy hub to validate judge-model calibration.

Benchmark Interpretation

  • ALFWorld appears in 9.1% of hub papers (1/11); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.
  • Arlarena appears in 9.1% of hub papers (1/11); use this cohort for benchmark-matched comparisons.

Metric Interpretation

  • accuracy is reported in 18.2% of hub papers (2/11); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
  • agreement is reported in 9.1% of hub papers (1/11); compare with a secondary metric before ranking methods.
Researcher Checklist (Expanded)

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Papers with explicit human feedback

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 45% target).

  • Gap: Papers reporting quality controls

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).

  • Strong: Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

    Coverage is strong (45.5% vs 35% target).

  • Moderate: Papers naming evaluation metrics

    Coverage is usable but incomplete (27.3% vs 35% target).

  • Gap: Papers with known rater population

    Coverage is a replication risk (18.2% vs 35% target).

  • Moderate: Papers with known annotation unit

    Coverage is usable but incomplete (27.3% vs 35% target).

Strengths

  • Agentic evaluation appears in 90.9% of papers.

Known Gaps

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (18.2% coverage).
  • LLM-as-judge appears without enough inter-annotator agreement reporting.

Suggested Next Analyses

  • Pair this hub with a human_eval-heavy hub to validate judge-model calibration.
  • Stratify by benchmark (ALFWorld vs Arlarena) before comparing methods.
  • Track metric sensitivity by reporting both accuracy and agreement.
Recommended Queries (Expanded)

Recommended Queries

Start Here (Best First 6)

Ranked for protocol completeness (human signal, benchmark + metric anchors, quality controls, and judge/human overlap).

Protocol Matrix (Top 12)

Use this to quickly compare protocol ingredients instead of scanning long prose.

Paper HF Signal Eval Modes Benchmarks Metrics QC
World-Model-Augmented Web Agents with Action Correction

Feb 17, 2026

No
Not Reported
Llm As Judge , Simulation Env VisualWebArena , Mind2Web Not Reported Not Reported
SELAUR: Self Evolving LLM Agent via Uncertainty-aware Rewards

Feb 24, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env ALFWorld , WebShop Not Reported Not Reported
Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agents

Feb 15, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env WebArena , OSWorld Not Reported Not Reported
ARLArena: A Unified Framework for Stable Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Feb 25, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env Arlarena Not Reported Not Reported
BrowseComp-$V^3$: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents

Feb 13, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics , Simulation Env Not Reported Accuracy Not Reported
LiLo-VLA: Compositional Long-Horizon Manipulation via Linked Object-Centric Policies

Feb 25, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env Not Reported Success rate Not Reported
Context-Aware Mapping of 2D Drawing Annotations to 3D CAD Features Using LLM-Assisted Reasoning for Manufacturing Automation

Feb 20, 2026

No
Not Reported
Automatic Metrics , Simulation Env Not Reported Accuracy , F1 Not Reported
Efficient Hierarchical Any-Angle Path Planning on Multi-Resolution 3D Grids

Feb 24, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Cooperative-Competitive Team Play of Real-World Craft Robots

Feb 24, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Architecting AgentOS: From Token-Level Context to Emergent System-Level Intelligence

Feb 24, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Contextual Safety Reasoning and Grounding for Open-World Robots

Feb 23, 2026

No
Not Reported
Simulation Env Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported

Protocol Diff (Top Papers)

Fast side-by-side comparison for the highest-ranked papers in this hub.

Signal World-Model-Augmented Web Agents with Action Correc… SELAUR: Self Evolving LLM Agent via Uncertainty-awa… Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI A…
Human Feedback Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Evaluation Modes Llm As Judge, Simulation EnvSimulation EnvSimulation Env
Benchmarks VisualWebArena, Mind2WebALFWorld, WebShopWebArena, OSWorld
Metrics Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Quality Controls Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Rater Population Domain ExpertsUnknownUnknown
Annotation Unit UnknownTrajectoryTrajectory
Suggested Reading Order (Extended)

This section is intentionally expanded only when needed; use “Start Here” above for a faster pass.

Suggested Reading Order

  1. ARLArena: A Unified Framework for Stable Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: simulation environments. Focus: Arlarena. Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (ARL) has rapidly gained attention as a promising paradigm for.

  2. LiLo-VLA: Compositional Long-Horizon Manipulation via Linked Object-Centric Policies

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: simulation environments. Focus: success rate. Abstract: General-purpose robots must master long-horizon manipulation, defined as tasks involving multiple kinematic.

  3. Efficient Hierarchical Any-Angle Path Planning on Multi-Resolution 3D Grids

    Start here for detailed protocol reporting and quality-control evidence. Signals: simulation environments. Abstract: Hierarchical, multi-resolution volumetric mapping approaches are widely used to represent large and complex environments as.

  4. World-Model-Augmented Web Agents with Action Correction

    Include a human-eval paper to calibrate against judge-based evaluation settings. Signals: LLM-as-judge. Focus: VisualWebArena. Abstract: A world model, specialized in environmental state transitions, simulates action outcomes, which a.

  5. SELAUR: Self Evolving LLM Agent via Uncertainty-aware Rewards

    Include a human-eval paper to calibrate against judge-based evaluation settings. Signals: simulation environments. Focus: ALFWorld. Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as multi-step decision-making agents, where.

  6. Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agents

    Adds simulation environments for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: simulation environments. Focus: WebArena. Abstract: The paper introduces GUI-Owl-1.5, the latest native GUI agent model that features.

  7. BrowseComp-$V^3$: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents

    Adds automatic metrics for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: automatic metrics. Focus: accuracy. Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs), equipped with increasingly advanced planning and tool-use.

  8. Cooperative-Competitive Team Play of Real-World Craft Robots

    Adds simulation environments for broader protocol coverage within this hub. Signals: simulation environments. Abstract: Multi-agent deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) has made significant progress in developing intelligent game-playing agents.

Known Limitations

Known Limitations

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (18.2% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
Research Utility Snapshot (Detailed)

Research Utility Snapshot

Human Feedback Mix

Evaluation Modes

  • Simulation Env (11)
  • Automatic Metrics (2)
  • Llm As Judge (1)

Top Benchmarks

  • ALFWorld (1)
  • Arlarena (1)
  • BrowseComp (1)
  • Mind2Web (1)

Top Metrics

  • Accuracy (2)
  • Agreement (1)
  • F1 (1)
  • Precision (1)

Rater Population Mix

  • Domain Experts (2)

Quality Controls

Coverage diagnostics (sample-based): human-feedback 0.0% · benchmarks 36.4% · metrics 27.3% · quality controls 0.0%.

Top Papers

Related Hubs

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.