- Validating Political Position Predictions of Arguments
Jordan Robinson, Angus R. Williams, Katie Atkinson, Anthony G. Cohn · Feb 20, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Human Eval
Real-world knowledge representation often requires capturing subjective, continuous attributes -- such as political positions -- that conflict with pairwise validation, the widely accepted gold standard for human evaluation.
- Evaluating Austrian A-Level German Essays with Large Language Models for Automated Essay Scoring
Jonas Kubesch, Lena Huber, Clemens Havas · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human Eval
This paper investigates the application of state-of-the-art open-weight LLMs for the grading of Austrian A-level German texts, with a particular focus on rubric-based evaluation.
- PONTE: Personalized Orchestration for Natural Language Trustworthy Explanations
Vittoria Vineis, Matteo Silvestri, Lorenzo Antonelli, Filippo Betello, Gabriele Tolomei · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Human Eval
To address these challenges, we present PONTE (Personalized Orchestration for Natural language Trustworthy Explanations), a human-in-the-loop framework for adaptive and reliable XAI narratives.
- VRM: Teaching Reward Models to Understand Authentic Human Preferences
Biao Liu, Ning Xu, Junming Yang, Hao Xu, Xin Geng · Mar 5, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Human Eval
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse natural language tasks, yet the reward models employed for aligning LLMs often encounter challenges of reward hacking, where the approaches predominantly rely on…
- HEART: A Unified Benchmark for Assessing Humans and LLMs in Emotional Support Dialogue
Laya Iyer, Kriti Aggarwal, Sanmi Koyejo, Gail Heyman, Desmond C. Ong · Jan 9, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Human EvalLlm As Judge
Despite rapid progress in language models, we still lack a clear way to understand how their abilities in these interpersonal domains compare to those of humans.
- Beyond Rows to Reasoning: Agentic Retrieval for Multimodal Spreadsheet Understanding and Editing
Anmol Gulati, Sahil Sen, Waqar Sarguroh, Kevin Paul · Mar 6, 2026 · Citations: 0
Human EvalAutomatic Metrics Long Horizon
We introduce Beyond Rows to Reasoning (BRTR), a multimodal agentic framework for spreadsheet understanding that replaces single-pass retrieval with an iterative tool-calling loop, supporting end-to-end Excel workflows from complex analysis…
- RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind
Zhitao He, Zongwei Lyu, Yi R Fung · Jan 22, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Human Eval
In this paper, we introduce RebuttalAgent, the first framework to ground academic rebuttal in Theory of Mind (ToM), operationalized through a ToM-Strategy-Response (TSR) framework that models reviewer mental state, formulates persuasion…
- Discovering Implicit Large Language Model Alignment Objectives
Edward Chen, Sanmi Koyejo, Carlos Guestrin · Feb 17, 2026 · Citations: 0
Rubric Rating Human Eval
To address these limitations, we introduce Obj-Disco, a framework that automatically decomposes an alignment reward signal into a sparse, weighted combination of human-interpretable natural language objectives.
- Balancing Multiple Objectives in Urban Traffic Control with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback
Chenyang Zhao, Vinny Cahill, Ivana Dusparic · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise PreferenceRlaif Or Synthetic Feedback Human Eval
Preference-based RL offers an appealing alternative by learning from human preferences over pairs of behavioural outcomes.
- CARE: An Explainable Computational Framework for Assessing Client-Perceived Therapeutic Alliance Using Large Language Models
Anqi Li, Chenxiao Wang, Yu Lu, Renjun Xu, Lizhi Ma · Feb 24, 2026 · Citations: 0
Human EvalAutomatic Metrics
Experiments show that CARE outperforms leading LLMs and substantially reduces the gap between counselor evaluations and client-perceived alliance, achieving over 70% higher Pearson correlation with client ratings.
- Distill and Align Decomposition for Enhanced Claim Verification
Jabez Magomere, Elena Kochkina, Samuel Mensah, Simerjot Kaur, Fernando Acero · Feb 25, 2026 · Citations: 0
Human EvalAutomatic Metrics
Across six evaluation settings, our trained 8B decomposer improves downstream verification performance to (71.75%) macro-F1, outperforming prompt-based approaches ((+1.99), (+6.24)) and existing RL methods ((+5.84)).
- Claim Automation using Large Language Model
Zhengda Mo, Zhiyu Quan, Eli O'Donohue, Kaiwen Zhong · Feb 18, 2026 · Citations: 0
Human EvalAutomatic Metrics
We assess this module using a multi-dimensional evaluation framework that combines automated semantic similarity metrics with human evaluation, enabling a rigorous examination of both practical utility and predictive accuracy.
