Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Daily Archive

HFEPX Daily Archive: 2026-02-12

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). 11 papers are grouped in this daily page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Human Eval. Common annotation unit: Scalar. Frequently cited benchmark: WebShop. Common metric signal: accuracy. Newest paper in this set is from Feb 12, 2026.

Papers: 11 Last published: Feb 12, 2026 Global RSS

Research Narrative

Grounded narrative Model: deterministic-grounded

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Feb 27, 2026). This page covers 11 papers centered on HFEPX Daily Archive: 2026-02-12. Common evaluation modes include Automatic Metrics, Human Eval, with benchmark emphasis on WebShop, Zoombench. Use the anchored takeaways below to compare protocol choices and identify papers with stronger evidence depth.

Why This Matters For Eval Research

Protocol Takeaways

Benchmark Interpretation

  • WebShop appears as a recurring benchmark anchor in this page.
  • 1 papers (9.1%) mention WebShop.
  • Most common evaluation modes: Simulation Env.

Metric Interpretation

  • accuracy is a common reported metric and should be paired with protocol context before ranking methods.
  • 3 papers (27.3%) mention accuracy.
  • Most common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics.

Researcher Checklist

  • Papers with explicit human feedback: Coverage is a replication risk (9.1% vs 45% target).
  • Papers reporting quality controls: Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).
  • Papers naming benchmarks/datasets: Coverage is a replication risk (18.2% vs 35% target).
  • Papers naming evaluation metrics: Coverage is strong (54.5% vs 35% target).
  • Papers with known rater population: Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).
  • Papers with known annotation unit: Coverage is a replication risk (18.2% vs 35% target).

Papers with explicit human feedback

Coverage is a replication risk (9.1% vs 45% target).

Papers reporting quality controls

Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).

Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

Coverage is a replication risk (18.2% vs 35% target).

Papers naming evaluation metrics

Coverage is strong (54.5% vs 35% target).

Papers with known rater population

Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).

Papers with known annotation unit

Coverage is a replication risk (18.2% vs 35% target).

Suggested Reading Order

  1. 1. propella-1: Multi-Property Document Annotation for LLM Data Curation at Scale

    Start with this anchor paper for scope and protocol framing. Covers Human Eval.

  2. 2. Think like a Scientist: Physics-guided LLM Agent for Equation Discovery

    Covers Automatic Metrics.

  3. 3. "Sorry, I Didn't Catch That": How Speech Models Miss What Matters Most

    Covers Automatic Metrics.

  4. 4. Scaling Model and Data for Multilingual Machine Translation with Open Large Language Models

    Covers Automatic Metrics.

  5. 5. Who is the richest club in the championship? Detecting and Rewriting Underspecified Questions Improve QA Performance

    Covers Automatic Metrics.

  6. 6. Zooming without Zooming: Region-to-Image Distillation for Fine-Grained Multimodal Perception

    Covers Automatic Metrics.

  7. 7. TSR: Trajectory-Search Rollouts for Multi-Turn RL of LLM Agents

    Covers Simulation Env.

  8. 8. Curriculum Learning and Pseudo-Labeling Improve the Generalization of Multi-Label Arabic Dialect Identification Models

    Covers Automatic Metrics.

Known Limitations

  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper method details may be missing.
  • Extraction fields are conservative and can under-report implicit protocol details.
  • Daily and rolling archives can be sparse and should be cross-checked with neighboring windows.

Research Utility Links

human_eval vs automatic_metrics

both=0, left_only=1, right_only=9

0 papers use both Human Eval and Automatic Metrics.

automatic_metrics vs simulation_env

both=0, left_only=9, right_only=1

0 papers use both Automatic Metrics and Simulation Env.

human_eval vs simulation_env

both=0, left_only=1, right_only=1

0 papers use both Human Eval and Simulation Env.

Papers Published On This Date

Recent Daily Archives