- SCOPE: Selective Conformal Optimized Pairwise LLM Judging
Sher Badshah, Ali Emami, Hassan Sajjad · Feb 13, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to replace costly human preference labels in pairwise evaluation.
- No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Grounding
Michael Krumdick, Charles Lovering, Varshini Reddy, Seth Ebner, Chris Tanner · Mar 7, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Llm As Judge
To address this gap, we introduce the Business and Finance Fundamentals Benchmark (BFF-Bench), a dataset of 160 challenging questions and long-form responses authored by financial professionals.
- Elo-Evolve: A Co-evolutionary Framework for Language Model Alignment
Jing Zhao, Ting Zhen, Junwei Bao, Hongfei Jiang, Yang Song · Feb 14, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics
Current alignment methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on compressing vast amounts of human preference data into static, absolute reward functions, leading to data scarcity, noise sensitivity, and training instability.
- DSPA: Dynamic SAE Steering for Data-Efficient Preference Alignment
James Wedgwood, Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab, Virginia Smith · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics
Preference alignment is usually achieved by weight-updating training on preference data, which adds substantial alignment-stage compute and provides limited mechanistic visibility.
- GIFT: Group-Relative Implicit Fine-Tuning Integrates GRPO with DPO and UNA
Zhichao Wang · Oct 27, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics
This paper proposes Group-relative Implicit Fine-Tuning (GIFT), a reinforcement learning framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) that unifies on-policy optimization with implicit preference learning.
- PIKA: Expert-Level Synthetic Datasets for Post-Training Alignment from Scratch
Shangjian Yin, Shining Liang, Wenbiao Ding, Yuli Qian, Zhouxing Shi · Oct 8, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
Despite its small size, fine-tuning Llama-3-8B-Base on PiKa-SFT even outperforms the official Llama-3-8B-Instruct model trained on over 10M proprietary examples on widely used benchmarks such as AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard.
- Revisiting Self-Play Preference Optimization: On the Role of Prompt Difficulty
Yao Xiao, Jung-jae Kim, Roy Ka-wei Lee, Lidong Bing · Oct 7, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
Self-play preference optimization has emerged as a prominent paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs).
- Evaluation of Large Language Models via Coupled Token Generation
Nina Corvelo Benz, Stratis Tsirtsis, Eleni Straitouri, Ivi Chatzi, Ander Artola Velasco · Feb 3, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
In this work, we argue that the evaluation and ranking of large language models should control for the randomization underpinning their functioning.
- TARo: Token-level Adaptive Routing for LLM Test-time Alignment
Arushi Rai, Qiang Zhang, Hanqing Zeng, Yunkai Zhang, Dipesh Tamboli · Mar 19, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
Recent test-time alignment methods offer a lightweight alternative, but have been explored mainly for preference alignment rather than reasoning.
- Examining Reasoning LLMs-as-Judges in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-Training
Yixin Liu, Yue Yu, DiJia Su, Sid Wang, Xuewei Wang · Mar 12, 2026 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
Reasoning LLMs-as-Judges, which can benefit from inference-time scaling, provide a promising path for extending the success of reasoning models to non-verifiable domains where the output correctness/quality cannot be directly checked.
- Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference Optimization
Junming Yang, Ning Xu, Biao Liu, Shiqi Qiao, Xin Geng · Sep 27, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
To bridge this gap, we propose Meta-Weighted Adaptive Preference Optimization (MetaAPO), a novel framework that dynamically couples data generation with model training.
- A Third Paradigm for LLM Evaluation: Dialogue Game-Based Evaluation using clembench
David Schlangen, Sherzod Hakimov, Chalamalasetti Kranti, Jonathan Jordan, Philipp Sadler · Jul 11, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
There are currently two main paradigms for evaluating large language models (LLMs), reference-based evaluation and preference-based evaluation.
- Search Arena: Analyzing Search-Augmented LLMs
Mihran Miroyan, Tsung-Han Wu, Logan King, Tianle Li, Jiayi Pan · Jun 5, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
In this work, we introduce Search Arena, a crowd-sourced, large-scale, human-preference dataset of over 24,000 paired multi-turn user interactions with search-augmented LLMs.
- Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
Xun Deng, Han Zhong, Rui Ai, Fuli Feng, Zheng Wang · Feb 20, 2025 · Citations: 0
Pairwise Preference
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising approach for aligning large language models with human preferences.
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection
Shachar Don-Yehiya, Asaf Yehudai, Leshem Choshen, Omri Abend · Mar 17, 2026 · Citations: 0
- When LLM Judge Scores Look Good but Best-of-N Decisions Fail
Eddie Landesberg · Mar 12, 2026 · Citations: 0
- Bridging Draft Policy Misalignment: Group Tree Optimization for Speculative Decoding
Shijing Hu, Jingyang Li, Zhihui Lu, Pan Zhou · Sep 26, 2025 · Citations: 0