Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (1693 stars)
- Stars
- 1,693
- Last push
- Mar 16, 2026 (96d ago)
Risk flags
- No Docker setup
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information is the primary contribution described in this paper.
ultralytics/ultralytics is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (AGPL-3.0).
Open ultralytics/ultralyticsEvidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 95/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (1693 stars)
Risk flags
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (58520 stars)
Risk flags
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Ultralytics YOLO 🚀
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Ready to reproduce
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics.git
pip install -e . No additional official repositories detected.
Implementation of paper - YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Learning What You Want Learn Programmable
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.