Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: medium

ultralytics/ultralytics is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (AGPL-3.0).

Open ultralytics/ultralytics

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

WongKinYiu/YOLO
historical official
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (1693 stars)

Stars
1,693
Last push
Mar 16, 2026 (96d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
ultralytics/ultralytics
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (58520 stars)

Stars
58,520
Last push
Jun 17, 2026 (3d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
wongkinyiu/yolov9
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Moderate

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
9,532
Last push
Aug 9, 2024 (680d ago)
ReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

ultralytics/ultralytics
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

Ultralytics YOLO 🚀

Stars: 58,520
Forks: 11,204
Last push: Jun 17, 2026
License: AGPL-3.0
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Community adoption signal (58520 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected ultralytics/ultralytics as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

WongKinYiu/YOLO
Stars: 1,693
Last push: Mar 16, 2026

Reproduction readiness

Ready to Run
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Ready to reproduce

  • · Clone ultralytics/ultralytics and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • · CI pipeline detected — automated tests are in place.
  • · Last updated 3 days ago.
Open ultralytics/ultralytics

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics.git
pip install -e .

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • wongkinyiu/yolov9
    Confidence: Medium

    Implementation of paper - YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information

    Stars: 9,532
    Last push: Aug 9, 2024
    License: GPL-3.0

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Learning What You Want Learn Programmable

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.