Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Widespread Flaws in Offline Evaluation of Recommender Systems

Published Jul 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Widespread Flaws in Offline Evaluation of Recommender Systems is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

hidasib/gru4rec_pytorch_official is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (83 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 83 GitHub stars.

Open hidasib/GRU4Rec
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: hidasib/GRU4Rec.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

hidasib/GRU4Rec
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
810
Last push
Aug 24, 2023 (1098d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
hidasib/recsys_eval_flaws
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
3
Last push
Jun 22, 2023 (1161d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • hidasib/GRU4Rec has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1098 days ago.
Open hidasib/GRU4Rec

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Official

  • hidasib/recsys_eval_flaws
    Confidence: High

    Experiments of the "Widespread flaws in offline evaluation of recommender systems" paper

    3 stars · 0 forks · Last push Jun 22, 2023

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).