Why Models Know But Don't Say: Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness Divergence Between Thinking Tokens and Answers in Open-Weight Reasoning Models
Richard J. Young
Abstract
Extended-thinking models expose a second text-generation channel ("thinking tokens") alongside the user-visible answer. This study examines 12 open-weight reasoning models on MMLU and GPQA questions paired with misleading hints. Among the 10,506 cases where models actually followed the hint (choosing the hint's target over the ground truth), each case is classified by whether the model acknowledges the hint in its th...
Results & Benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chain-of-thought Faithfulness Divergence Between Thinking Tokens | Step-3.5-Flash | N | 757 |
| Chain-of-thought Faithfulness Divergence Between Thinking Tokens | GPT-OSS-120B | N | 819 |
| Chain-of-thought Faithfulness Divergence Between Thinking Tokens | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | N | 903 |
| Chain-of-thought Faithfulness Divergence Between Thinking Tokens | OLMo-3.1-32B | N | 153 |
Hardware Requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Best Implementation
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the Implementation Status and Reproduction Path sections below for the current action plan.
Reproduction Path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 2
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Additional Implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face Artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches: