Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Unifying Vision, Text, and Layout for Universal Document Processing

Published Dec 1, 2022
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Unifying Vision, Text, and Layout for Universal Document Processing is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Question answering Donut Question Answering 72.1 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited
microsoft/i-code

microsoft/i-Code

1,703 stars · 166 forks · Last push Sep 27, 2024 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (1703 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

microsoft/i-code is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).

Open microsoft/i-code
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected microsoft/i-code as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

microsoft/i-code
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1,703
Last push
Sep 27, 2024 (698d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
microsoft/udop
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
249
Last push
Jan 22, 2023 (1313d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
DS4SD/MarkushGrapher
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
78
Last push
May 29, 2026 (89d)

Community adoption signal (78 stars)

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • microsoft/i-code has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 698 days ago.
Open microsoft/i-code

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Question answering

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Question answering Computer vision

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).