Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Face Recognition
AdaCos*
Rank-1 accuracy .
97.41
Source: paper fulltext
Face Recognition
ArcFace*
Rank-1 accuracy .
98.35
Source: paper fulltext
Face Recognition
Circle-loss*
Rank-1 accuracy .
98.50
Source: paper fulltext
Face Recognition
ArcFace
Q2
4.04
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

4 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Face Recognition AdaCos* Rank-1 accuracy . 97.41 paper-derived No explicit refs
Face Recognition ArcFace* Rank-1 accuracy . 98.35 paper-derived No explicit refs
Face Recognition Circle-loss* Rank-1 accuracy . 98.50 paper-derived No explicit refs
Face Recognition ArcFace Q2 4.04 paper-derived No explicit refs

Unified Negative Pair Generation toward Well-discriminative Feature Space for Face Recognition is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

tomas-gajarsky/facetorch is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (612 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 612 GitHub stars.

Open jung-jun-uk/unpg

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 1 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

jung-jun-uk/unpg
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
33
Last push
Mar 14, 2022 (1557d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

jung-jun-uk/unpg
Historical official
Stars: 33
Last push: Mar 14, 2022
  • Only historical official repository was found: jung-jun-uk/unpg.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · jung-jun-uk/unpg has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 1557 days ago.
Open jung-jun-uk/unpg

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Face Recognition

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.