Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
2 risk flags
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Computer vision
mPLUG-owl
Effect.
0.47
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Computer vision mPLUG-owl Effect. 0.47 paper-derived No explicit refs

Uncovering What, Why and How: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causation Understanding of Video Anomaly is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

fesvhtr/cuva is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open fesvhtr/cuva

Reproduction Risks

  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

fesvhtr/cuva
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
88
Last push
Apr 14, 2026 (67d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
dulpy/ecva
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (83 stars)

Stars
83
Last push
Dec 25, 2024 (542d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

fesvhtr/cuva
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

[CVPR 2024] Official repository of the paper "Uncovering What, Why and How: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causation Understanding of Video Anomaly"

Stars: 88
Forks: 22
Last push: Apr 14, 2026
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (88 stars)
License –
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected fesvhtr/cuva as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 20, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · fesvhtr/cuva has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open fesvhtr/cuva

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/fesvhtr/cuva.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Computer vision

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote