Uncertainty-Aware Rank-One MIMO Q Network Framework for Accelerated Offline Reinforcement Learning
Thanh Nguyen, Tung Luu, Tri Ton, Sungwoong Kim, Chang D. Yoo
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) has garnered significant interest due to its safe and easily scalable paradigm. However, training under this paradigm presents its own challenge: the extrapolation error stemming from out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Existing methodologies have endeavored to address this issue through means like penalizing OOD Q-values or imposing similarity constraints on the learned policy and the ...
behavior policy. Nonetheless, these approaches are often beset by limitations such as being overly conservative in utilizing OOD data, imprecise OOD data characterization, and significant computational overhead. To address these challenges, this paper introduces an Uncertainty-Aware Rank-One Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) Q Network framework. The framework aims to enhance Offline Reinforcement Learning by fully leveraging the potential of OOD data while still ensuring efficiency in the learning process. Specifically, the framework quantifies data uncertainty and harnesses it in the training losses, aiming to train a policy that maximizes the lower confidence bound of the corresponding Q-function. Furthermore, a Rank-One MIMO architecture is introduced to model the uncertainty-aware Q-function, \TP{offering the same ability for uncertainty quantification as an ensemble of networks but with a cost nearly equivalent to that of a single network}. Consequently, this framework strikes a harmonious balance between precision, speed, and memory efficiency, culminating in improved overall performance. Extensive experimentation on the D4RL benchmark demonstrates that the framework attains state-of-the-art performance while remaining computationally efficient. By incorporating the concept of uncertainty quantification, our framework offers a promising avenue to alleviate extrapolation errors and enhance the efficiency of offline RL.
Results & Benchmarks
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) has garnered significant interest due to its safe and easily scalable paradigm.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 85/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies.
- Start from this likely method family: Reinforcement learning.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
0
Citations
71
References
Tasks
Computer science, Benchmark (surveying), Scalability, Rank (graph theory), Overhead (engineering), Function (biology), Data mining
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Related papers
-
Search on Paper2Code
Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies (2009) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Support Structure Performance Benchmark (2023) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Exploring disk performance benchmarks (2017) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Solutions to the Third Benchmark Control Problem (1991) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
A Benchmark Characterization of the EEMBC Benchmark Suite (2009) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
The Performance Validation of Linear Programming Algorithm Based on Integrated Benchmark (2010) Semantic similarity
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.