Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Natural language processing
Mistral-7b
Social Chemistry 101
0.647
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Natural language processing Mistral-7b Social Chemistry 101 0.647 paper-derived No explicit refs

TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

HowieHwong/TrustLLM is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open HowieHwong/TrustLLM

Reproduction Risks

  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

HowieHwong/TrustLLM
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
627
Last push
Jun 24, 2025 (361d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
8
Last push
Aug 12, 2025 (312d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
2
Last push
May 17, 2026 (34d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

HowieHwong/TrustLLM
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

[ICML 2024] TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models

Stars: 627
Forks: 67
Last push: Jun 24, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (627 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected HowieHwong/TrustLLM as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 15, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · HowieHwong/TrustLLM has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 361 days ago.
Open HowieHwong/TrustLLM

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Natural language processing

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.