Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Trust-Aware Safe Control for Autonomous Navigation: Estimation of System-to-Human Trust for Trust-Adaptive Control Barrier Functions

Saad Ejaz, Masaki InouePublished Oct 29, 2024
DOI Publisher
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

A trust-aware safe control system for autonomous navigation in the presence of humans, specifically pedestrians, is presented. The system combines model predictive control (MPC) with control barrier functions (CBFs) and system-to-human trust (SHT) estimation to ensure safe and reliable navigation in human-populated environments. In the context of this article, we refer to SHT as the confidence score that a system has in an agent/pedestrian’s attentiveness. Pedestrian SHT values are computed based on features, extracted from camera sensor images, such as mutual eye contact, smartphone usage, and pose fluctuations and are integrated into the MPC controller’s CBF constraints, allowing the autonomous vehicle to make informed decisions considering pedestrian behavior. Simulations conducted in the CARLA driving simulator demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed system, showcasing more conservative behavior around inattentive pedestrians and vice versa. The results highlight the practicality of the system in real-world applications, providing a promising approach to enhance the safety and efficiency of autonomous navigation systems, especially self-driving vehicles.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
A trust-aware safe control system for autonomous navigation in the presence of humans, specifically pedestrians, is presented.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

6

Citations

44

References

Tasks

Control (management), Estimation, Computer science, Public trust, Control system, autonomous navigation, human-vehicle interaction, autonomous vehicles

Methods

model predictive control

Domains

Computer security

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.