Cheng Jiayang, Xin Liu, Zhihan Zhang, Haoyang Wen, Zixuan Zhang, Qingyu Yin, Shiyang Li, Priyanka Nigam, Bing Yin, Chao Zhang, Yangqiu Song
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Multi-step tool orchestration, where LLMs must invoke multiple dependent APIs in the correct order while propagating intermediate outputs, remains challenging. State-of-the-art models frequently fail on full sequence execution, with parameter value errors accounting for a significant portion of failures. Training models to handle such workflows faces two obstacles: existing environments focus on simple per-turn funct ...
ion calls with simulated data, and binary rewards provide no signal for partial correctness. We present a framework addressing both challenges. First, we construct a reinforcement learning environment backed by a large-scale cache of real API responses, enabling a data synthesis pipeline that samples valid multi-step orchestration traces with controllable complexity and significantly higher generation efficiency than unconstrained methods. Second, we propose a graduated reward design that decomposes correctness into atomic validity (individual function call correctness at increasing granularity) and orchestration (correct tool sequencing with dependency respect). On ComplexFuncBench, our approach demonstrates substantial improvements in turn accuracy. Ablation studies confirm both reward components are essential: using either alone significantly degrades performance.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reinforcement learning | Qwen3-8B | +RL | 52.1 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Reinforcement learning | Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | +RL | 33.8 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Reinforcement learning | Qwen3-8B-1e-6 | 5 | 32.5 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Reinforcement learning | Qwen3-8B-5e-6 | 5 | 30.3 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Multi-step tool orchestration, where LLMs must invoke multiple dependent APIs in the correct order while propagating intermediate outputs, remains challenging.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Reinforcement learning
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.