Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Towards reliable predictive analytics: a generalized calibration framework

Published Sep 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Towards reliable predictive analytics: a generalized calibration framework is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited
bavodc/calibrationcurves

R package to assess the calibration performance of prediction models. See Barreñada et al. (2025) <doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.08389>, De Cock Campo (2023) <doi:10.48550/arXiv.2309.08559> and Van Calster et al. (2016) <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005>.

26 stars · 11 forks · Last push Mar 31, 2026

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (26 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

bavodc/calibrationcurves is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present.

Open bavodc/calibrationcurves
Reproduction risks
  • License metadata missing
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected bavodc/calibrationcurves as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

bavodc/calibrationcurves
best maintained
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
26
Last push
Mar 31, 2026 (147d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
bavodc/papergeneralizedcalibrationcurves
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1
Last push
Sep 18, 2023 (1073d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
BavoDC/CalibrationCurves
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
26
Last push
Mar 31, 2026 (147d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (26 stars)

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • bavodc/calibrationcurves has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open bavodc/calibrationcurves

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Broaden model search

reliable predictive analytics generalized

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).