Towards Financial World Modeling
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Building a world model requires a state representation useful for planning and decision-making---potentially over tasks unknown at training time. In the context of financial markets, planning and decision-making may require a model to reason about market-wide conditions, asset-specific expected returns, liquidity, volatility, and cross-asset relationships. Yet financial representation learning has largely been evaluated on individual predictive tasks, oftentimes on a single time period using comparatively narrow datasets. We address this through three primary contributions. First, we introduce Market-1T, a dataset containing nearly one trillion observations across U.S. equities from 2008 to 2025 at 1 Hz resolution. Second, we develop and implement a rigorous evaluation protocol. Third, we conduct a systematic large-scale study of financial representation learning, comparing 18 encoder-training strategies across nearly two decades of market regimes. We evaluate learned representations both by their predictive utility on common finance tasks and through probes of latent structure. We find that encoders with similar predictive performance can organize market state very differently. Collectively, we establish a foundation for training and evaluating financial market representations in support of world models such as DINO-WM, V-JEPA 2, and LeWM.
Results and benchmarks
Building a world model requires a state representation useful for planning and decision-making---potentially over tasks unknown at training time.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 9
- Last push
- Oct 12, 2026 (13d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 6
- Last push
- Oct 8, 2026 (17d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Medium
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 26
- Last push
- Oct 8, 2026 (17d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
No additional official repositories detected.
Community
- fin-ai-lab/tfwmConfidence: Medium
Towards Financial World Modeling, NeurIPS 2026
26 stars · 2 forks · Last push Oct 8, 2026 · MIT license
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- physicalreasoning/causal-jepa
Confidence: Low · 9 stars
- fin-ai-lab/market-1t
Confidence: Low · 6 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPX