Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
2 risk flags
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms
Full Model
ETTm2
5.8752
Source: paper fulltext
Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms
5.6673
ETTm2
1353.9381
Source: paper fulltext
Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms
Training Strategies
ETTm2
6.3558
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms Full Model ETTm2 5.8752 paper-derived No explicit refs
Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms 5.6673 ETTm2 1353.9381 paper-derived No explicit refs
Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms Training Strategies ETTm2 6.3558 paper-derived No explicit refs

Time Series Forecasting as Reasoning: A Slow-Thinking Approach with Reinforced LLMs is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

lqzxt/time-r1 is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open lqzxt/time-r1

Reproduction Risks

  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

lqzxt/time-r1
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
97
Last push
Apr 14, 2026 (60d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (52 stars)

Stars
52
Last push
Nov 27, 2025 (198d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

lqzxt/time-r1
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Time-R1 is a two-stage reinforcement fine-tuning framework that trains large language models to perform slow-thinking, step-by-step reasoning for accurate and explainable time series forecasting.

Stars: 97
Forks: 12
Last push: Apr 14, 2026
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (97 stars)
License –
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected lqzxt/time-r1 as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 12, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · lqzxt/time-r1 has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open lqzxt/time-r1

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/lqzxt/time-r1.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Slow-thinking Approach Reinforced Llms

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.