Kai-Wei Chang, Wei-Chih Chen, En-Pei Hu, Hung-yi Lee, James Glass
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
We propose TiCo, a simple post-training method for enabling spoken dialogue models (SDMs) to follow time-constrained instructions and generate responses with controllable duration. This capability is valuable for real-world spoken language systems such as voice assistants and interactive agents, where controlling response duration can improve interaction quality. However, despite their strong ability to generate natu ...
ral spoken responses, existing models lack time awareness and struggle to follow duration-related instructions (e.g., "Please generate a response lasting about 15 seconds"). Through an empirical evaluation of both open-source and commercial SDMs, we show that they frequently fail to satisfy such time-control requirements. TiCo addresses this limitation by enabling models to estimate elapsed speaking time during generation through Spoken Time Markers (STM) (e.g., <10.6 seconds>). These markers help the model maintain awareness of time and adjust the remaining content to meet the target duration. TiCo is simple and efficient: it requires only a small amount of data and no additional question-answer pairs, relying instead on self-generation and reinforcement learning. Experimental results show that TiCo significantly improves adherence to duration constraints while preserving response quality.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
We propose TiCo, a simple post-training method for enabling spoken dialogue models (SDMs) to follow time-constrained instructions and generate responses with controllable duration.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Instruction tuning
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Large Language Models
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.