Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
jax

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning presents a lora / parameter-efficient tuning method.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

kipgparker/soft-prompt-tuning is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 350 GitHub stars.

Open google-research/prompt-tuning

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

google-research/prompt-tuning
historical official
Maintenance: Archived
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
701
Last push
Mar 6, 2025 (451d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • Repository archived
  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (28 stars)

Stars
28
Last push
Mar 1, 2023 (1187d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
67
Last push
Mar 10, 2023 (1178d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

google-research/prompt-tuning
Historical official
Stars: 701
Last push: Mar 6, 2025
Archived
  • Only historical official repository was found: google-research/prompt-tuning.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: May 30, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repository archived — fork required

  • · google-research/prompt-tuning has been archived. Fork the repository before using it.
  • · No further updates or bug fixes will be made by the original authors.
Open google-research/prompt-tuning

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

LoRA

Methods

LoRA / Parameter-efficient tuning

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.