Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
- Stars
- 211
- Last push
- Feb 16, 2026 (58d ago)
Risk flags
- No Docker setup
Shir Ashury-Tahan, Yifan Mai, Rajmohan C, Ariel Gera, Yotam Perlitz, Asaf Yehudai, Elron Bandel, Leshem Choshen, Eyal Shnarch, Percy Liang, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Despite its real-world significance, model performance on tabular data remains underexplored, leaving uncertainty about which model to rely on and which prompt configuration to adopt. To address this gap, we create ToRR, a benchmark for Table Reasoning and Robustness, measuring model performance and robustness on table-related tasks. The benchmark includes 10 datasets that cover different types of table reasoning cap ...
abilities across varied domains. ToRR goes beyond model performance rankings, and is designed to reflect whether models can handle tabular data consistently and robustly, across a variety of common table representation formats. We present a leaderboard as well as comprehensive analyses of the results of leading models over ToRR. Our results reveal a striking pattern of brittle model behavior, where even strong models are unable to perform robustly on tabular data tasks. Although no specific table format leads to consistently better performance, we show that testing over multiple formats is crucial for reliably estimating model capabilities. Moreover, we show that the reliability boost from testing multiple prompts can be equivalent to adding more test examples. Overall, our findings show that table understanding and reasoning tasks remain a significant challenge.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Despite its real-world significance, model performance on tabular data remains underexplored, leaving uncertainty about which model to rely on and which prompt configuration to adopt.
ibm/unitxt is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).
Open ibm/unitxtEvidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 95/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
🦄 Unitxt is a Python library for enterprise-grade evaluation of AI performance, offering the world's largest catalog of tools and data for end-to-end AI benchmarking
Ready to reproduce
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/ibm/unitxt.git
pip install -e . No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Broaden model search
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Benchmark Table Reasoning Robustness
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.