Alexandru Iosup, Ahmed Musaafir, Alexandru Uta, Arnau Prat Pérez, Gábor Szárnyas, Hassan Chafi, Ilie Gabriel Tănase, Lifeng Nai, Michael Anderson, Mihai Capotă, Narayanan Sundaram, Peter Boncz, Siegfried Depner, Stijn Heldens, Thomas Manhardt, Tim Hegeman, Wing Lung Ngai, Yinglong Xia
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
In this document, we describe LDBC Graphalytics, an industrial-grade benchmark for graph analysis platforms. The main goal of Graphalytics is to enable the fair and objective comparison of graph analysis platforms. Due to the diversity of bottlenecks and performance issues such platforms need to address, Graphalytics consists of a set of selected deterministic algorithms for full-graph analysis, standard graph datase ...
ts, synthetic dataset generators, and reference output for validation purposes. Its test harness produces deep metrics that quantify multiple kinds of systems scalability, weak and strong, and robustness, such as failures and performance variability. The benchmark also balances comprehensiveness with runtime necessary to obtain the deep metrics. The benchmark comes with open-source software for generating performance data, for validating algorithm results, for monitoring and sharing performance data, and for obtaining the final benchmark result as a standard performance report.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
In this document, we describe LDBC Graphalytics, an industrial-grade benchmark for graph analysis platforms.
ldbc/ldbc_graphalytics is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Strong overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 88 GitHub stars.
Open ldbc/ldbc_graphalytics_docsHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
LDBC Graphalytics implementation using SuiteSparse:GraphBLAS and LAGraph
LDBC Graphalytics implementation using SuiteSparse:GraphBLAS and LAGraph
LDBC Graphalytics implementation using SuiteSparse:GraphBLAS and LAGraph
atlarge-research/graphalytics-platforms-neo4j
No additional community repositories detected yet.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.