Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

The KiTS19 Challenge Data: 300 Kidney Tumor Cases with Clinical Context, CT Semantic Segmentations, and Surgical Outcomes is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

neheller/kits19 is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (NOASSERTION). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open neheller/kits19

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

neheller/kits19
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
465
Last push
May 13, 2026 (38d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
4rrw/TOM-2020
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
5
Last push
May 16, 2024 (765d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
wangwangwang978/MindSpore2022-BDCI
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
5
Last push
Nov 22, 2022 (1306d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

neheller/kits19
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

The official repository of the 2019 Kidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge

Stars: 465
Forks: 182
Last push: May 13, 2026
License: NOASSERTION
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (465 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected neheller/kits19 as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · neheller/kits19 has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open neheller/kits19

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/neheller/kits19.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Computer vision

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote