Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

The Extender: A Log-Structured Transformer

Jakob ErikssonPublished Sep 26, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

We introduce the Extender, a log-structured variant of the standard Transformer architecture. In a standard Transformer, each layer communicates with subsequent layers exclusively via the residual $\mathbf{h}$, a superposition channel. The Extender adds a concatenation channel $\mathbf{x}$: each layer $\ell$ emits both a residual update $δ_\ell$ which is added to $\mathbf{h}$, and a much smaller extension $ε_\ell$ which is appended to $\mathbf{x}$. While both the FFN and $\mathbf{q}$ see $\mathbf{h}$, the attention $\mathbf{kv}$ projections take only $\mathbf{x}$ as input. As a result, the fully extended $\mathbf{x}$ contains the complete input for the $\mathbf{kv}$ projections of all layers, reducing the persistent attention memory footprint from $2Ld_{model}$ to $\sum|ε_\ell|$. We find that with $|ε_\ell|=32$, the Extender matches Transformer accuracy on short-context (CORE) tasks at 199M-924M parameters, and exceeds Transformer accuracy on long-context (RULER) workloads, again at 924M parameters. For our 1664-wide, 924M model, the Extender's persistent attention memory footprint is $104\times$ smaller than MHA. The memory savings grow with model width.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
We introduce the Extender, a log-structured variant of the standard Transformer architecture.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Transformer Extender 1k 91.4 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Framework baselines

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Transformer

Methods

Transformer

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.