Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

The Effect of Third Party Implementations on Reproducibility

Balázs Hidasi, Ádám Tibor CzappPublished Jul 27, 2023
arXiv PDF DOI
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Reproducibility of recommender systems research has come under scrutiny during recent years. Along with works focusing on repeating experiments with certain algorithms, the research community has also started discussing various aspects of evaluation and how these affect reproducibility. We add a novel angle to this discussion by examining how unofficial third-party implementations could benefit or hinder reproducibility. Besides giving a general overview, we thoroughly examine six third-party implementations of a popular recommender algorithm and compare them to the official version on five public datasets. In the light of our alarming findings we aim to draw the attention of the research community to this neglected aspect of reproducibility.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Reproducibility of recommender systems research has come under scrutiny during recent years.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

pcerdam/KerasGRU4Rec is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (106 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 106 GitHub stars.

Open hidasib/GRU4Rec
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: hidasib/GRU4Rec.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

hidasib/GRU4Rec
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
810
Last push
Aug 24, 2023 (1098d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
paxcema/KerasGRU4Rec
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
106
Last push
Jul 30, 2024 (757d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
hidasib/gru4rec_pytorch_official
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
83
Last push
Aug 24, 2023 (1098d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • hidasib/GRU4Rec has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1098 days ago.
Open hidasib/GRU4Rec

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Framework baselines

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Official

  • paxcema/KerasGRU4Rec
    Confidence: High

    Keras implementation of GRU4Rec session-based recommender system

    106 stars · 40 forks · Last push Jul 30, 2024

  • hidasib/gru4rec_pytorch_official
    Confidence: High

    Official implementation of the GRU4Rec algorithm in PyTorch

    83 stars · 12 forks · Last push Aug 24, 2023

  • hidasib/gru4rec_tensorflow_official
    Confidence: High

    Official implementation of the GRU4Rec algorithm in Tensorflow

    7 stars · 1 forks · Last push Nov 28, 2023

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

20

Citations

43

References

Tasks

Implementation, Reproducibility, Scrutiny, Computer science, Recommender system, Data science, Information Systems

Methods

Information retrieval

Domains

None detected

Related papers

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Implementation Reproducibility Scrutiny Computer science Recommender system Data science

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).