The Dark Side of ChatGPT: Legal and Ethical Challenges from Stochastic Parrots and Hallucination
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
With the launch of ChatGPT, Large Language Models (LLMs) are shaking up our whole society, rapidly altering the way we think, create and live. For instance, the GPT integration in Bing has altered our approach to online searching. While nascent LLMs have many advantages, new legal and ethical risks are also emerging, stemming in particular from stochastic parrots and hallucination. The EU is the first and foremost jurisdiction that has focused on the regulation of AI models. However, the risks posed by the new LLMs are likely to be underestimated by the emerging EU regulatory paradigm. Therefore, this correspondence warns that the European AI regulatory paradigm must evolve further to mitigate such risks.
Results and benchmarks
With the launch of ChatGPT, Large Language Models (LLMs) are shaking up our whole society, rapidly altering the way we think, create and live.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Bridging the Transparency Gap: What Can Explainable AI Learn from the AI Act?.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
19
Citations
3
References
Tasks
Transparency (behavior), Obligation, Business, EU AI Act, transparency obligations, AI regulation, explainability, Social Sciences
Methods
algorithmic accountability, algorithmic fairness
Domains
Computer security
Related papers
- Bridging the Transparency Gap: What Can Explainable AI Learn from the AI Act?Search on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
- Transparency in the EU AI Act: Distributed Duties and Non-SubstitutabilitySearch on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
- Habemus a Right to an Explanation: so What? – A Framework on Transparency-Explainability Functionality and Tensions in the EU AI ActSearch on Paper2Code
2024 · Semantic similarity
- Transparency in the Labyrinths of the EU AI Act: Smart or Disbalanced?Search on Paper2Code
2025 · Semantic similarity
- MAKING AI’S TRANSPARENCY TRANSPARENT: notes on the EU Proposal for the AI ActSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Regulating transparency: a critique of the “free and open source AI” definition in the EU AI actSearch on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.