Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
The Brier Score under Administrative Censoring: Problems and Solutions is the primary contribution described in this paper.
havakv/pycox is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (BSD-2-Clause).
Open havakv/pycoxHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Community adoption signal (342 stars) · Repository is archived
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
Risk flags
Survival analysis with PyTorch
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Broaden model search
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceEvaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.