Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registration

Published Jan 1, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registration is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

A fast and robust point cloud registration library

2,337 stars · 414 forks · Last push Dec 9, 2025 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

MIT-SPARK/TEASER-plusplus is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open MIT-SPARK/TEASER-plusplus
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected MIT-SPARK/TEASER-plusplus as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
2,337
Last push
Dec 9, 2025 (260d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
757
Last push
Aug 13, 2026 (13d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (757 stars)

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
44
Last push
Aug 20, 2025 (372d)

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (44 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • MIT-SPARK/TEASER-plusplus has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 260 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
Open MIT-SPARK/TEASER-plusplus

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/MIT-SPARK/TEASER-plusplus.git
pip install -e .

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • MIT-SPARK/KISS-Matcher
    Confidence: Medium

    KISS-Matcher: Fast, Robust, and Scalable Registration + ROS2 SLAM examples

    757 stars · 90 forks · Last push Aug 13, 2026 · MIT license

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).