Taming the Adversary: Stable Minimax Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient via Fractional Objectives
Taeho Lee, Donghwan Lee
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved remarkable success in a wide range of control and decision-making tasks. However, RL agents often exhibit unstable or degraded performance when deployed in environments subject to unexpected external disturbances and model uncertainties. Consequently, ensuring reliable performance under such conditions remains a critical challenge. In this paper, we propose minimax deep determ ...
inistic policy gradient (MMDDPG), a framework for learning disturbance-resilient policies in continuous control tasks. The training process is formulated as a minimax optimization problem between a user policy and an adversarial disturbance policy. In this problem, the user learns a robust policy that minimizes the objective function, while the adversary generates disturbances that maximize it. To stabilize this interaction, we introduce a fractional objective that balances task performance and disturbance magnitude. This objective prevents excessively aggressive disturbances and promotes robust learning. Experimental evaluations in MuJoCo environments demonstrate that the proposed MMDDPG achieves significantly improved robustness against both external force perturbations and model parameter variations.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved remarkable success in a wide range of control and decision-making tasks.
Implementation Evidence Summary
yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: reinforcement learning). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 578 GitHub stars.
Reproduction Risks
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-PapersAdjacentConfidence: MediumStars: 578
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: reinforcement learning
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
None detected
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.