Skip to content

Researcher verdict

Recommended implementation path available

implementation baseline
Benchmark trust: thin evidence

This page has evidence-backed benchmark findings and a concrete implementation recommendation anchored on haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent. Use it as an implementation baseline, then validate benchmark parity before adapting it.

Why this page is still worth reading

  • A concrete repository path exists via haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent, so this page can act as a practical starting point.
  • Reproduction risks are surfaced explicitly, which helps decide whether the paper is worth immediate prototyping.

Benchmark trust

Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.

Use this page as

Start here when you need the most practical implementation path quickly.

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Empathetic Dialogue Perceptible Acoustic Reception Reaction
EXPRESSO
Accuracy
87.9
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Empathetic Dialogue Perceptible Acoustic Reception Reaction EXPRESSO Accuracy 87.9 paper-derived No explicit refs

Talk With Human-like Agents: Empathetic Dialogue Through Perceptible Acoustic Reception and Reaction is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

LLM evidence refs: evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_17], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_18], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_4], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_5], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_1], guidance.riskFlags[0], guidance.riskFlags[1], repos[0].fullName, researcherSummary.hardwareNotes[0], researcherSummary.timeToFirstMeaningfulRun, evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_3], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_23], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0], paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
50
Last push
Aug 6, 2024 (585d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
youngsheen/gpst
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Community adoption signal (69 stars)

Stars
69
Last push
Nov 1, 2024 (498d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
50
Last push
Aug 6, 2024 (585d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Paper summary

AI-generated

AI-generated summary grounded in paper metadata and artifact signals.

PerceptiveAgent implements an empathetic dialogue pipeline that combines a speech captioner trained on TextrolSpeech with an MSMA-Synthesizer vocoder trained on EXPRESSO, LJSpeech, and VCTK to generate affectively aligned acoustic. This page includes benchmark evidence for Empathetic dialogue acoustic response generation on EXPRESSO. Reproduction guidance focuses on implementation viability and concrete risk controls.

Key contributions

  • PerceptiveAgent implements an empathetic dialogue pipeline that combines a speech captioner trained on TextrolSpeech with an MSMA-Synthesizer vocoder trained on EXPRESSO, LJSpeech, and VCTK to generate affectively.
  • The MSMA-Synthesizer is designed to preserve speaking style factors such as emotion, speed, energy, gender, and pitch, and is evaluated using accuracy on EXPRESSO read and conversation subsets and F0 Frame Error.
  • PerceptiveAgent’s performance is decomposed into cognitive empathy measured with BERTScore on linguistic content and affective empathy measured with accuracy on generated acoustic responses.
  • The speech captioner shows attribute-dependent performance differences across genders, with notably lower F1-scores for female speech on pitch and speed, indicating potential bias or reduced robustness.
  • Ablation results for the MSMA-Synthesizer indicate that removing individual style factors such as speed, energy, gender, or pitch sharply reduces accuracy on EXPRESSO read and conversation subsets, showing strong.

Implementation guidance

Use haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent first because deterministic ranking and extracted evidence align on implementation viability. Start with the repo setup path, then validate benchmark reproduction before adaptation.

Reproducibility notes

  • Environment setup may fail or produce inconsistent behavior because there is no dependency manifest or CI to pin library versions.
  • Vocoder pretraining on EXPRESSO, LJSpeech, and VCTK is compute-intensive and, if undertrained, can degrade downstream empathy metrics.
  • Misconfiguration of Vicuna or llama_model paths in the capspt_train configuration can prevent the language model component from loading correctly.
  • Differences in preprocessing or dataset splits for EXPRESSO or TextrolSpeech can lead to benchmark scores that diverge from the reported accuracy and BERTScore.
  • Ablation experiments may be irreproducible if style conditioning flags are not toggled exactly as in the MSMA-Synthesizer evaluation setup.

Best implementation now

haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Code for Talk With Human-like Agents: Empathetic Dialogue Through Perceptible Acoustic Reception and Reaction (ACL24))

Stars: 50
Forks: 3
Last push: Aug 6, 2024
License: Apache-2.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (50 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction path

Direct

Follow the direct implementation path

  1. 1

    Start with haoqiu-yan/perceptiveagent and validate setup instructions in README.

  2. 2

    Reproduce the baseline result with the provided defaults before modifying hyperparameters.

  3. 3

    Log exact dependency versions and runtime environment for reproducibility.

Time to first repro: a few days
No CI workflows detected
Dependency manifest is missing

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • Haoqiu-Yan/PerceptiveAgent
    Confidence: Medium

    Code for Talk With Human-like Agents: Empathetic Dialogue Through Perceptible Acoustic Reception and Reaction (ACL24))

    Stars: 50
    Last push: Aug 6, 2024
    License: Apache-2.0

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Empathetic Dialogue Perceptible Acoustic Reception Reaction

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.