Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning

Published Aug 1, 2019
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning Forest Cover Type Test accuracy . 89.34 paper-derived
Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning Poker Hand induction Test accuracy . 65.1 paper-derived
Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning XGBoost Test accuracy . 98.2 paper-derived
Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning CatBoost Test accuracy . 98.2 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

TabNet for fastai

124 stars · 12 forks · Last push Jun 23, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (124 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: medium

mgrankin/fast_tabnet is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open mgrankin/fast_tabnet
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected mgrankin/fast_tabnet as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
38,606
Last push
Aug 21, 2026 (3d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (38606 stars)

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
2,955
Last push
Oct 23, 2024 (670d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
1,677
Last push
Apr 17, 2026 (130d)

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (1677 stars)

  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone mgrankin/fast_tabnet and install dependencies from environment.yml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 62 days ago.
Open mgrankin/fast_tabnet

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/mgrankin/fast_tabnet.git
conda env create -f environment.yml && conda activate <env-name>

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • dreamquark-ai/tabnet
    Confidence: Medium

    PyTorch implementation of TabNet paper : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.07442.pdf

    2,955 stars · 516 forks · Last push Oct 23, 2024 · MIT license

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).