Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Support vector comparison machines

David Venuto, Toby Dylan Hocking, Lakjaree Sphanurattana, Masashi SugiyamaPublished Jan 30, 2014
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

In ranking problems, the goal is to learn a ranking function from labeled pairs of input points. In this paper, we consider the related comparison problem, where the label indicates which element of the pair is better, or if there is no significant difference. We cast the learning problem as a margin maximization, and show that it can be solved by converting it to a standard SVM. We use simulated nonlinear patterns, a real learning to rank sushi data set, and a chess data set to show that our proposed SVMcompare algorithm outperforms SVMrank when there are equality pairs.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
In ranking problems, the goal is to learn a ranking function from labeled pairs of input points.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (tdhock/rankSVMcompare).

Open tdhock/rankSVMcompare
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: tdhock/rankSVMcompare.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

tdhock/rankSVMcompare
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
5
Last push
Feb 7, 2018 (3120d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
tdhock/compare-paper
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Feb 8, 2018 (3120d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
dvVenuto/compare-paper
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Dec 20, 2017 (3169d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • tdhock/rankSVMcompare has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 3120 days ago.
Open tdhock/rankSVMcompare

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).