Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 2,279
- Last push
- Aug 30, 2021 (1755d ago)
Risk flags
- Repository archived
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
Alexis Conneau, Douwe Kiela, Holger Schwenk, Loic Barrault, Antoine Bordes
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Many modern NLP systems rely on word embeddings, previously trained in an unsupervised manner on large corpora, as base features. Efforts to obtain embeddings for larger chunks of text, such as sentences, have however not been so successful. Several attempts at learning unsupervised representations of sentences have not reached satisfactory enough performance to be widely adopted. In this paper, we show how universal ...
sentence representations trained using the supervised data of the Stanford Natural Language Inference datasets can consistently outperform unsupervised methods like SkipThought vectors on a wide range of transfer tasks. Much like how computer vision uses ImageNet to obtain features, which can then be transferred to other tasks, our work tends to indicate the suitability of natural language inference for transfer learning to other NLP tasks. Our encoder is publicly available.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Many modern NLP systems rely on word embeddings, previously trained in an unsupervised manner on large corpora, as base features.
facebookresearch/SentEval is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Official implementation from Papers with Code). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 2108 GitHub stars.
Open facebookresearch/InferSentHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Community adoption signal (1411 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
Repository archived — fork required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Official implementation from Papers with Code
A python tool for evaluating the quality of sentence embeddings.
No additional community repositories detected yet.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Broaden model search
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Image classification
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Computer vision, Natural Language Processing
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.