What is the best open-source implementation of "Study of sedimentation of non-cohesive particles via CFD-DEM simulations"?

The best maintained implementation is xiaoh/sediFoam with 122 stars on GitHub. Confidence: high. Reproducibility: Limited.

Are there pretrained models available for "Study of sedimentation of non-cohesive particles via CFD-DEM simulations"?

Yes, 1 Hugging Face model found. The top result is GusPuffy/sentient-simulations-pydecompiler-3.7-6.7b-v0.9 with 6 downloads.

What framework is used to implement "Study of sedimentation of non-cohesive particles via CFD-DEM simulations"?

The primary implementation uses none.

Study of sedimentation of non-cohesive particles via CFD-DEM simulations

Q: How reproducible is "Study of sedimentation of non-cohesive particles via CFD-DEM simulations"?

Estimated time to first reproduction: a few days. Risk flags: No CI workflows detected, Dependency manifest is missing. Start with xiaoh/sediFoam and validate setup instructions in README.

Published: Nov 1, 2017

Best maintained implementation now

Evidence: Direct

Domain fit: AI-adjacent

Verified repos: 1

Top repo stars: 122

Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Framework: none

Time to first repro: a few days

2 risk flags

arXiv PDF

Technical details

Canonical key: arxiv-1711.01524

Cache status: Stale (SWR served)

Generated at: Jun 18, 2026, 3:51 AM

Artifact coverage: direct

HF provider: ok (token)

PWC source used: Yes

LLM status: not_generated

LLM model: n/a

LLM generated: Unknown

LLM content type: n/a

HF policy: hf-relevance-v27

implementation starting point

Benchmarks: missing

Time to repro: a few days

2 risk flags

none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold

Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Study of sedimentation of non-cohesive particles via CFD-DEM simulations focuses on scientific computing.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

xiaoh/sediFoam is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (GPL-2.0).

Open xiaoh/sediFoam

Reproduction Risks

No CI workflows detected
Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 1 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

xiaoh/sediFoam

best maintained

Maintenance: Stale risk

Confidence: High

Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars: 122
Last push: Jul 8, 2025 (347d ago)

Risk flags

No CI pipeline detected
No tagged releases
No Docker setup

Best implementation now

xiaoh/sediFoam

Confidence: High

Reproducibility: Limited

CFD-DEM Solver with emphasis on sediment transport

Stars: 122

Forks: 53

Last push: Jul 8, 2025

License: GPL-2.0

Official implementation from Papers with Code

Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Community adoption signal (122 stars)

License ✓

CI –

Deps –

Docker –

Selected xiaoh/sediFoam as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work

Time to first repro: days

Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

· xiaoh/sediFoam has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
· You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
· Last push was 347 days ago.

Open xiaoh/sediFoam

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.