Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Stroke Extraction for Offline Handwritten Mathematical Expression Recognition

Chungkwong ChanPublished Jan 1, 2020
DOI Publisher
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Offline handwritten mathematical expression recognition is often considered much harder than its online counterpart due to the absence of temporal information. In order to take advantage of the more mature methods for online recognition and save resources, an oversegmentation approach is proposed to recover strokes from textual bitmap images automatically. The proposed algorithm first breaks down the skeleton of a binarized image into junctions and segments, then segments are merged to form strokes, finally stroke order is normalized by using recursive projection and topological sort. Good offline accuracy was obtained in combination with ordinary online recognizers, which were not specially designed for extracted strokes. Given a ready-made state-of-the-art online handwritten mathematical expression recognizer, the proposed procedure correctly recognized 58.22%, 65.65%, and 65.22% of the offline formulas rendered from the datasets of the Competitions on Recognition of Online Handwritten Mathematical Expressions (CROHME) in 2014, 2016, and 2019 respectively. Furthermore, given a trainable online recognition system, retraining it with extracted strokes resulted in an offline recognizer with the same level of accuracy. On the other hand, the speed of the entire pipeline was fast enough to facilitate on-device recognition on mobile phones with limited resources. To conclude, stroke extraction provides an attractive way to build optical character recognition software.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Offline handwritten mathematical expression recognition is often considered much harder than its online counterpart due to the absence of temporal information.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

33

Citations

45

References

Tasks

Computer science, Pipeline (software), Pattern recognition (psychology), Expression (computer science), Skeletonization, Projection (relational algebra), Abstraction, Online and offline

Methods

None detected

Domains

Artificial intelligence, Speech recognition, Image (mathematics), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX