Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Strip Pooling: Rethinking Spatial Pooling for Scene Parsing

Published Mar 1, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Strip Pooling: Rethinking Spatial Pooling for Scene Parsing is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Rethinking Spatial Pooling Scene Parsing RefineNet mIoU 40.70 paper-derived
Rethinking Spatial Pooling Scene Parsing PSPNet mIoU 44.94 paper-derived
Rethinking Spatial Pooling Scene Parsing SAC Test mIoU. 78.1 paper-derived
Rethinking Spatial Pooling Scene Parsing DUC-HDC Test mIoU. 80.1 paper-derived
Rethinking Spatial Pooling Scene Parsing DSSPN Test mIoU. 77.8 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (Andrew-Qibin/SPNet).

Open Andrew-Qibin/SPNet
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: Andrew-Qibin/SPNet.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Andrew-Qibin/SPNet
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
415
Last push
Jun 10, 2020 (2267d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Mar 7, 2022 (1632d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 23, 2020 (2132d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • Andrew-Qibin/SPNet has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 2267 days ago.
Open Andrew-Qibin/SPNet

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Rethinking Spatial Pooling Scene Parsing

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).