STAR: A First-Ever Dataset and a Large-Scale Benchmark for Scene Graph Generation in Large-Size Satellite Imagery
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Scene graph generation (SGG) in satellite imagery (SAI) benefits promoting understanding of geospatial scenarios from perception to cognition. In SAI, objects exhibit great variations in scales and aspect ratios, and there exist rich relationships between objects (even between spatially disjoint objects), which makes it attractive to holistically conduct SGG in large-size very-high-resolution (VHR) SAI. However, there lack such SGG datasets. Due to the complexity of large-size SAI, mining triplets subject, relationship, object heavily relies on long-range contextual reasoning. Consequently, SGG models designed for small-size natural imagery are not directly applicable to large-size SAI. This paper constructs a large-scale dataset for SGG in large-size VHR SAI with image sizes ranging from 512 × 768 to 27,860 × 31,096 pixels, named STAR (Scene graph generaTion in lArge-size satellite imageRy), encompassing over 210K objects and over 400K triplets. To realize SGG in large-size SAI, we propose a context-aware cascade cognition (CAC) framework to understand SAI regarding object detection (OBD), pair pruning and relationship prediction for SGG. We also release a SAI-oriented SGG toolkit with about 30 OBD and 10 SGG methods which need further adaptation by our devised modules on our challenging STAR dataset. The dataset and toolkit are available at: https://linlin-dev.github.io/project/STAR.
Results and benchmarks
Scene graph generation (SGG) in satellite imagery (SAI) benefits promoting understanding of geospatial scenarios from perception to cognition.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Framework baselines
- TorchVision object detection finetuning tutorial
Baseline setup for object detection workflows.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
61
Citations
101
References
Tasks
Computer science, Benchmark (surveying), Scale (ratio), Satellite, Satellite imagery, Star (game theory), Remote sensing, Graph
Methods
None detected
Domains
Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Related papers
- Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary PoliciesSearch on Paper2Code
2009 · Semantic similarity
- Support Structure Performance BenchmarkSearch on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
- Exploring disk performance benchmarksSearch on Paper2Code
2017 · Semantic similarity
- Solutions to the Third Benchmark Control ProblemSearch on Paper2Code
1991 · Semantic similarity
- A Benchmark Characterization of the EEMBC Benchmark SuiteSearch on Paper2Code
2009 · Semantic similarity
- The Performance Validation of Linear Programming Algorithm Based on Integrated BenchmarkSearch on Paper2Code
2010 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.