Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Stacked Capsule Autoencoders

Adam R. Kosiorek, Sara Sabour, Yee Whye Teh, Geoffrey E. HintonPublished Jun 17, 2019
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Objects are composed of a set of geometrically organized parts. We introduce an unsupervised capsule autoencoder (SCAE), which explicitly uses geometric relationships between parts to reason about objects. Since these relationships do not depend on the viewpoint, our model is robust to viewpoint changes. SCAE consists of two stages. In the first stage, the model predicts presences and poses of part templates directly from the image and tries to reconstruct the image by appropriately arranging the templates. In the second stage, SCAE predicts parameters of a few object capsules, which are then used to reconstruct part poses. Inference in this model is amortized and performed by off-the-shelf neural encoders, unlike in previous capsule networks. We find that object capsule presences are highly informative of the object class, which leads to state-of-the-art results for unsupervised classification on SVHN (55%) and MNIST (98.7%). The code is available at https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/stacked_capsule_autoencoders

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Objects are composed of a set of geometrically organized parts.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Google Research

38,611 stars · 8,464 forks · Last push Aug 21, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (38611 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

google-research/google-research is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open google-research/google-research
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected google-research/google-research as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
38,611
Last push
Aug 21, 2026 (4d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Archived
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
81
Last push
Feb 10, 2022 (1657d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • Repository archived
  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
38
Last push
Jul 25, 2024 (761d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • google-research/google-research has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open google-research/google-research

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Broaden model search

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).