SPTS v2: Single-Point Scene Text Spotting
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
End-to-end scene text spotting has made significant progress due to its intrinsic synergy between text detection and recognition. Previous methods commonly regard manual annotations such as horizontal rectangles, rotated rectangles, quadrangles, and polygons as a prerequisite, which are much more expensive than using single-point. Our new framework, SPTS v2, allows us to train high-performing text-spotting models using a single-point annotation. SPTS v2 reserves the advantage of the auto-regressive Transformer with an Instance Assignment Decoder (IAD) through sequentially predicting the center points of all text instances inside the same predicting sequence, while with a Parallel Recognition Decoder (PRD) for text recognition in parallel, which significantly reduces the requirement of the length of the sequence. These two decoders share the same parameters and are interactively connected with a simple but effective information transmission process to pass the gradient and information. Comprehensive experiments on various existing benchmark datasets demonstrate the SPTS v2 can outperform previous state-of-the-art single-point text spotters with fewer parameters while achieving 19× faster inference speed. Within the context of our SPTS v2 framework, our experiments suggest a potential preference for single-point representation in scene text spotting when compared to other representations. Such an attempt provides a significant opportunity for scene text spotting applications beyond the realms of existing paradigms.
Results and benchmarks
End-to-end scene text spotting has made significant progress due to its intrinsic synergy between text detection and recognition.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Laboratory Evaluation of Stuck Pipe Spotting Fluid Effectiveness.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Framework baselines
- Hugging Face Transformers training guide
Modern transformer training baseline.
- PyTorch nn.Transformer docs
Reference transformer building block implementation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
51
Citations
93
References
Tasks
Spotting, Computer science, Inference, Context (archaeology), Point (geometry), Pattern recognition (psychology), Representation (politics)
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Computer vision, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Related papers
- Laboratory Evaluation of Stuck Pipe Spotting Fluid EffectivenessSearch on Paper2Code
1981 · Semantic similarity
- Spotting Value, Spotting WasteSearch on Paper2Code
2017 · Semantic similarity
- Towards the integration of spontaneous speech and gesture based on spotting methodSearch on Paper2Code
2002 · Semantic similarity
- ICDAR 2021 Competition on Scene Video Text SpottingSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Document image segmentation & text localizationSearch on Paper2Code
2016 · Semantic similarity
- From spotting the difference to spotting your differenceSearch on Paper2Code
2015 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.