Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Smart Contract Languages: a comparative analysis

Published Apr 1, 2024
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Smart Contract Languages: a comparative analysis is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited
blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts

A chrestomathy of smart contracts in different smart contract languages

33 stars · 9 forks · Last push Jul 15, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts
best maintained
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
33
Last push
Jul 15, 2026 (41d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
blockchain-unica/smart-contracts-comparison
historical official
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
33
Last push
Jul 15, 2026 (41d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 19, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open blockchain-unica/rosetta-smart-contracts

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Broaden dataset search

smart contract languages comparative dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).