Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Simple techniques work surprisingly well for neural network test prioritization and active learning (replicability study)

Michael Weiß, Paolo TonellaPublished Jul 15, 2022
DOI Publisher
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.

Test Input Prioritizers (TIP) for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are an important\ntechnique to handle the typically very large test datasets efficiently, saving\ncomputation and labeling costs. This is particularly true for large-scale,\ndeployed systems, where inputs observed in production are recorded to serve as\npotential test or training data for the next versions of the system. Feng et.\nal. propose DeepGini, a very fast and simple TIP, and show that it outperforms\nmore elaborate techniques such as neuron- and surprise coverage. In a\nlarge-scale study (4 case studies, 8 test datasets, 32'200 trained models) we\nverify their findings. However, we also find that other comparable or even\nsimpler baselines from the field of uncertainty quantification, such as the\npredicted softmax likelihood or the entropy of the predicted softmax\nlikelihoods perform equally well as DeepGini.\n

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Test Input Prioritizers (TIP) for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are an important\ntechnique to handle the typically very large test datasets efficiently, saving\ncomputation and labeling costs.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

53

Citations

24

References

Tasks

Softmax function, Computer science, Artificial neural network, Deep neural networks, Simple (philosophy), Computation, Surprise, Scale (ratio)

Methods

None detected

Domains

Machine learning, Artificial intelligence, Field (mathematics)

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers