Simple techniques work surprisingly well for neural network test prioritization and active learning (replicability study)
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Test Input Prioritizers (TIP) for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are an important\ntechnique to handle the typically very large test datasets efficiently, saving\ncomputation and labeling costs. This is particularly true for large-scale,\ndeployed systems, where inputs observed in production are recorded to serve as\npotential test or training data for the next versions of the system. Feng et.\nal. propose DeepGini, a very fast and simple TIP, and show that it outperforms\nmore elaborate techniques such as neuron- and surprise coverage. In a\nlarge-scale study (4 case studies, 8 test datasets, 32'200 trained models) we\nverify their findings. However, we also find that other comparable or even\nsimpler baselines from the field of uncertainty quantification, such as the\npredicted softmax likelihood or the entropy of the predicted softmax\nlikelihoods perform equally well as DeepGini.\n
Results and benchmarks
Test Input Prioritizers (TIP) for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are an important\ntechnique to handle the typically very large test datasets efficiently, saving\ncomputation and labeling costs.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Exploring Alternatives to Softmax Function.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
53
Citations
24
References
Tasks
Softmax function, Computer science, Artificial neural network, Deep neural networks, Simple (philosophy), Computation, Surprise, Scale (ratio)
Methods
None detected
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence, Field (mathematics)
Related papers
- Exploring Alternatives to Softmax FunctionSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Effectiveness of MPC-friendly Softmax ReplacementSearch on Paper2Code
2020 · Semantic similarity
- Design and Implementation of an Approximate Softmax Layer for Deep Neural NetworksSearch on Paper2Code
2020 · Semantic similarity
- Sparse-softmax: A Simpler and Faster Alternative Softmax TransformationSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- An Exploration of Softmax Alternatives Belonging to the Spherical Loss FamilySearch on Paper2Code
2016 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.