Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

ShuffleSeg: Real-time Semantic Segmentation Network

Published Mar 1, 2018
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
ShuffleSeg: Real-time Semantic Segmentation Network is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Computer vision UNet mIoU 79.1 paper-derived
Computer vision SkipNet mIoU 78.2 paper-derived
Computer vision Dilation8s mIoU 79.3 paper-derived
Segmentation SegNet Category IoU 79.8 paper-derived
Segmentation ENet Category IoU 80.4 paper-derived
Segmentation ShuffleSeg Category IoU 80.2 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: medium

Hardy-Uint/awesome-Autopilot-algorithm is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Title overlap with paper keywords (50%)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 186 GitHub stars.

Open MSiam/TFSegmentation
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: MSiam/TFSegmentation.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

MSiam/TFSegmentation
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
592
Last push
Nov 22, 2022 (1372d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
792
Last push
Jul 13, 2019 (2600d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (792 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 23, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • MSiam/TFSegmentation has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 1372 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open MSiam/TFSegmentation

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/MSiam/TFSegmentation.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision, Segmentation

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).