Self-Regulated Interactive Sequence-to-Sequence Learning
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Not all types of supervision signals are created equal: Different types of feedback have different costs and effects on learning. We show how self-regulation strategies that decide when to ask for which kind of feedback from a teacher (or from oneself) can be cast as a learning-to-learn problem leading to improved cost-aware sequence-to-sequence learning. In experiments on interactive neural machine translation, we find that the self-regulator discovers an $ε$-greedy strategy for the optimal cost-quality trade-off by mixing different feedback types including corrections, error markups, and self-supervision. Furthermore, we demonstrate its robustness under domain shift and identify it as a promising alternative to active learning.
Results and benchmarks
Not all types of supervision signals are created equal: Different types of feedback have different costs and effects on learning.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Reinforcement Learning for Machine Translation: from Simulations to Real-World Applications.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Framework baselines
- Hugging Face Transformers training guide
Modern transformer training baseline.
- PyTorch nn.Transformer docs
Reference transformer building block implementation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
0
Citations
45
References
Tasks
Robustness (evolution), Ask price, Sequence (biology), Computer science, Sequence learning, Regulator, Physical Sciences
Methods
None detected
Domains
Artificial intelligence, Machine learning
Related papers
- Reinforcement Learning for Machine Translation: from Simulations to Real-World ApplicationsSearch on Paper2Code
2020 · Semantic similarity
- Learning Online from Corrective Feedback: A Meta-Algorithm for RoboticsSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Assessing Benefit from Feature Feedback in Active Learning for Text ClassificationSearch on Paper2Code
2011 · Semantic similarity
- PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingSearch on Paper2Code
2021 · Semantic similarity
- Stable Coactive Learning via PerturbationSearch on Paper2Code
2013 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.