Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Self-Correction for Human Parsing

Published Oct 1, 2019
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Self-Correction for Human Parsing is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Human Parsing Attention mIoU. 56.39 paper-derived
Human Parsing HAZN mIoU. 57.54 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

An out-of-box human parsing representation extractor.

1,251 stars · 267 forks · Last push Aug 30, 2024 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

PeikeLi/Self-Correction-Human-Parsing is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open PeikeLi/Self-Correction-Human-Parsing
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected PeikeLi/Self-Correction-Human-Parsing as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1,251
Last push
Aug 30, 2024 (726d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
TannedCung/SCHP
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
6
Last push
Sep 17, 2020 (2170d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
1
Last push
Sep 13, 2025 (347d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • PeikeLi/Self-Correction-Human-Parsing has environment.yml but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 726 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open PeikeLi/Self-Correction-Human-Parsing

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/PeikeLi/Self-Correction-Human-Parsing.git
conda env create -f environment.yml && conda activate <env-name>

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Human Parsing

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).