Select-then-Solve: Paradigm Routing as Inference-Time Optimization for LLM Agents
Heng Zhou, Zelin Tan, Zhemeng Zhang, Yutao Fan, Yibing Lin +13 more
Abstract
When an LLM-based agent improves on a task, is the gain from the model itself or from the reasoning paradigm wrapped around it? We study this question by comparing six inference-time paradigms, namely Direct, CoT, ReAct, Plan-Execute, Reflection, and ReCode, across four frontier LLMs and ten benchmarks, yielding roughly 18,000 runs. We find that reasoning structure helps dramatically on some tasks but hurts on others...
Results & Benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic tool use | Base | Gemini | 60.3 |
Hardware Requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Best Implementation
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the Implementation Status and Reproduction Path sections below for the current action plan.
Reproduction Path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 2
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Additional Implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face Artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches: