Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach
Results and benchmarks
Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach is the primary contribution described in this paper.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrent Depth Approach | GSM8K | Accuracy | 20.00 | paper-derived |
| Recurrent Depth Approach | MBPP | pass@1 | 43.80 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Pretraining and inference code for a large-scale depth-recurrent language model
961 stars · 87 forks · Last push Dec 29, 2025 · Apache-2.0 license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search
seal-rg/recurrent-pretraining is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open seal-rg/recurrent-pretraining- No CI workflows detected
- Selected seal-rg/recurrent-pretraining as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 961
- Last push
- Dec 29, 2025 (261d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 273
- Last push
- Jul 8, 2025 (435d)
Community adoption signal (273 stars)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 10
- Last push
- Sep 11, 2026 (5d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Reproduction readiness
Setup required
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
- seal-rg/recurrent-pretraining has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
- Last push was 261 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
- No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
- No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/seal-rg/recurrent-pretraining.git
pip install -e . Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- gair-nlp/prox
Confidence: Low · 273 stars
- diamond2nv/hfpapers-crawler
Confidence: Low · 10 stars
- tomoqt/Latent_ttc
Confidence: Low · 2 stars
- maxyu1115/recpre-adapt
Confidence: Low · 1 stars
- davidmacmillan/DeepLearningStudyGroup
Confidence: Low · 41 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Recurrent Depth Approach
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).