Scalable Person Re-identification: A Benchmark
Liang Zheng, Liyue Shen, Lu Tian, Shengjin Wang, Jingdong Wang, Qi Tian
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
This paper contributes a new high quality dataset for person re-identification, named "Market-1501". Generally, current datasets: 1) are limited in scale, 2) consist of hand-drawn bboxes, which are unavailable under realistic settings, 3) have only one ground truth and one query image for each identity (close environment). To tackle these problems, the proposed Market-1501 dataset is featured in three aspects. First, ...
it contains over 32,000 annotated bboxes, plus a distractor set of over 500K images, making it the largest person re-id dataset to date. Second, images in Market-1501 dataset are produced using the Deformable Part Model (DPM) as pedestrian detector. Third, our dataset is collected in an open system, where each identity has multiple images under each camera. As a minor contribution, inspired by recent advances in large-scale image search, this paper proposes an unsupervised Bag-of-Words descriptor. We view person re-identification as a special task of image search. In experiment, we show that the proposed descriptor yields competitive accuracy on VIPeR, CUHK03, and Market-1501 datasets, and is scalable on the large-scale 500k dataset.
Results & Benchmarks
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
This paper contributes a new high quality dataset for person re-identification, named "Market-1501".
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
4,581
Citations
59
References
Tasks
Computer science, Benchmark (surveying), Identification (biology), Scalability, Ground truth, Pattern recognition (psychology), Set (abstract data type), Identity (music)
Methods
None detected
Domains
Artificial intelligence, Image (mathematics), Computer vision, Machine learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Related papers
-
Search on Paper2Code
Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies (2009) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Support Structure Performance Benchmark (2023) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Exploring disk performance benchmarks (2017) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Solutions to the Third Benchmark Control Problem (1991) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
A Benchmark Characterization of the EEMBC Benchmark Suite (2009) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
The Performance Validation of Linear Programming Algorithm Based on Integrated Benchmark (2010) Semantic similarity
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.