Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Detection
Deformable DETR
mAP
50.0
Source: paper fulltext
Detection
Swin Transformer
mAP
53.8
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

2 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Detection Deformable DETR mAP 50.0 paper-derived No explicit refs
Detection Swin Transformer mAP 53.8 paper-derived No explicit refs

SARATR-X: Toward Building A Foundation Model for SAR Target Recognition is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

waterdisappear/SARATR-X is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (NOASSERTION).

Open waterdisappear/SARATR-X

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

waterdisappear/SARATR-X
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
241
Last push
May 4, 2026 (48d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (100 stars)

Stars
100
Last push
Apr 5, 2026 (76d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (100 stars)

Stars
100
Last push
Apr 5, 2026 (76d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

waterdisappear/SARATR-X
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

A Foundation Model for SAR Target Recognition

Stars: 241
Forks: 19
Last push: May 4, 2026
License: NOASSERTION
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (241 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected waterdisappear/SARATR-X as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · waterdisappear/SARATR-X has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open waterdisappear/SARATR-X

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Building Foundation Model Sar Target Recognition, Detection

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.