Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

RMBench: Memory-Dependent Robotic Manipulation Benchmark with Insights into Policy Design

Tianxing Chen, Yuran Wang, Mingleyang Li, Yan Qin, Hao Shi +14 morePublished Mar 1, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Robotic manipulation policies have made rapid progress in recent years, yet most existing approaches give limited consideration to memory capabilities. Consequently, they struggle to solve tasks that require reasoning over historical observations and maintaining task-relevant information over time, which are common requirements in real-world manipulation scenarios. Although several memory-aware policies have been proposed, systematic evaluation of memory-dependent manipulation remains underexplored, and the relationship between architectural design choices and memory performance is still not well understood. To address this gap, we introduce RMBench, a simulation benchmark comprising 9 manipulation tasks that span multiple levels of memory complexity, enabling systematic evaluation of policy memory capabilities. We further propose Mem-0, a modular manipulation policy with explicit memory components designed to support controlled ablation studies. Through extensive simulation and real-world experiments, we identify memory-related limitations in existing policies and provide empirical insights into how architectural design choices influence memory performance. The website is available at https://rmbench.github.io/.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
Robotic manipulation policies have made rapid progress in recent years, yet most existing approaches give limited consideration to memory capabilities.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Medium
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
223
Last push
Sep 20, 2026 (40d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Gkym8/imitation
alternative
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 20, 2026 (9d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Gkym8/PreCode
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Aug 8, 2026 (82d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 29, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • RoboTwin-Platform/RMBench
    Confidence: Medium

    Memory-Dependent Manipulation Benchmark based on RoboTwin

    223 stars · 24 forks · Last push Sep 20, 2026 · MIT license

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Scientific computing

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.